How tax optimization can maximize the returns on your investment property
If you’re not careful, taxes can eat away at the bulk of the income you should be earning on your foreign investment properties.
This fact alone sends chills down the spines of property investors everywhere. A recent survey conducted by Tranio.com revealed that 18% of property investors believe structuring purchases for maximum tax optimization is the single most difficult part of acquiring real estate abroad.
To further complicate matters, more than 100 countries have committed to the Common Reporting Standard (CRS), an initiative developed by the Organization for Economic
In accordance with the CRS, between 2017 and 2018 countries around the globe will launch the automatic exchange of financial account information, dispelling the opacity that previously enabled wealthy citizens to squirrel their money away into foreign bank accounts in order to dodge tax obligations in their home countries.
In light of the shifting realities of tax optimization, I want to offer you some advice on how to acquire foreign properties with tax optimization in mind. Please note that this is general advice. I strongly encourage you to consult a tax advisor who is familiar with the nuances of your situation before you purchase any property.
Pros and cons of purchasing a property as an individual vs. via a legal entity
If tax optimization is a key priority, you would do well to begin by determining whether it would be wisest to purchase your property as an individual or via a legal entity.
Because tax rates and terms differ considerably between these two categories, your choice in this matter will have a key impact on your total tax obligations in connection with the property.
The table below outlines some of the basic differences:
|Advantages||— No need to pay the costs associated with maintaining a company;
— Capital gains taxes can be lower for individuals than for legal entities (some countries provide capital gains tax exemptions after a few years of property ownership)
|— If the property generates significant profits, tax rates may be lower for legal entities than for individuals;>
— The possibility of exemption from capital gains and dividend taxation if the rules of strategic participation apply;>
— In some countries, i.e. Germany and France, no inheritance tax applies to property acquisitions by a company;>
— Increased flexibility with respect to selling shares or the property itself;
— Greater protection against the disclosure of information.
|Disadvantages||— Income tax can be higher for individuals than for legal entities;
— No flexibility with respect to withdrawing from the sale;
— It is impossible to conceal the identity of the beneficiary.
|— There are costs associated with running a company;
— In some countries, i.e. the United Kingdom and France, specific property taxes apply to legal entities.
When our clients are considering purchasing a property valued at about EUR 1.25 million or less, we generally recommend that they make the purchase in their individual capacities. It is typically cheaper and easier to do so due to the additional expenses associated with opening and maintaining a company.
However, this isn’t universally true; in some countries, individuals are subject to higher income tax rates than legal entities, which can offset any advantage of purchasing as an individual. This tends to hold truer the higher the individual’s income.
If the property is worth upwards of about EUR 1.25 million, it is typically advantageous to make the purchase via a legal entity. In this case, lower income tax rates and greater opportunities for tax optimization tend to offset the
This is largely attributable to the fact that a relatively expensive property would usher in relatively high income, which in many countries would expose an individual owner to higher tax rates than it would a legal entity.
Consider, for example, a property in Germany that generates rental income of more than EUR 50,000 per year. An individual owner would pay some 40% in taxes, while a company would pay a comparatively meager 15%.
Generally, such savings would fully offset the cost of launching and maintaining a company. However, this holds primarily true in cases where the company and its owner are both tax residents of the same country. Otherwise, dividend taxes would negate any tax benefits derived from purchasing a company as a legal entity.
What taxes do legal entities usually need to pay for properties?
If a legal entity owns
- Taxes on any income generated by the property (rental income, capital gains from the sale of the property or the sale of a portion of the legal entity or its shares)
- Property tax (usually compensated by tenants)
- Land tax
- Inheritance tax, if applicable (exemptions often apply)
- Tax on dividends (exemptions typically apply if the investor refrains from distributing dividends and instead reinvests the funds in the same country, for example into another property).
|Income tax/profit||Capital gains tax||Estate tax||Property tax|
|United Kingdom||Individuals||40% (this does not apply between spouses)||Not applicable*|
|Legal entities||20%||20%||Not applicable||From GBP 3,500 for properties valued at more than GBP 500,000*|
|Germany||Individuals||Up to 50%||Not applicable*|
|Legal entities||15.825%||15,825% (not applicable if the owner invests in another German property within four years of the sale)||Not applicable under certain circumstances**||Not applicable*|
|Legal entities||33.33%||33.33% (not applicable after 22 years of ownership)||Not applicable upon registration with a Société Civile Immobilière (SCI)||3%*|
Taxes on rental income
Rental income tax is included in the corporate tax rate and is payable in the tax jurisdiction where the property is located. As a general rule, if a company is liable for taxes in a foreign jurisdiction, and a double taxation treaty applies between the company’s home jurisdiction and their foreign jurisdiction, the amount of taxes paid overseas is to be subtracted from the amount of taxes that is supposed to be paid home. The difference should be paid in the home jurisdiction. If the tax overseas is bigger, then there will be no taxes home.
In order to reduce your income tax base, you will need to scour the tax regulations for deductible expenses that apply to your purchase, ownership and maintenance of the property. Such deductions may include:
- The cost of acquiring a founder loan;
- The cost of acquiring a bank loan;
- Building depreciation;
- Leasehold improvements;
- Transaction execution expenses;
- Property tax;
- Property management and maintenance expenses;
- Other expenses during the ownership period.
Taken together, the aforementioned deductions can significantly reduce a property owner’s income tax base during the first decade of ownership. The table below outlines a typical German example.
|Standard tax scheme||Effective tax scheme|
|Tax base calculation|
|Annual rental income||30,000|
|Building depreciation deduction (2%)||10,000||10,000|
|Deduction of mortgage interest
(LTV 50%, 2% per annum)
|Deduction of founder loan interest
(LTV 50%, 4% per annum)*
|Corporate tax (15%)||3,000||750|
|Solidarity surcharge (0.825%)||165||082.50|
|Total tax sum||3,165||832.50|
|Annual income after taxes||26,835||32,417.50|
|Percentage of annual rental
income that taxes account
for under both schemes
A founder loan could enable you to save part of your income from dividend taxes.
Founder loan interest is subject to the investor’s personal tax obligations in the country of his or her tax residency. But the investor must also be ready to pay founder loan taxes in the country where that interest was generated.
Capital gains and asset transfer tax
Whether you will be obligated to pay capital gains tax or asset transfer tax depends on the ownership structure at the moment of the sale. This can occur either when you sell the property itself (asset deal), or when you sell the company that you purchased the company through (share deal).
In the case of an asset deal, capital gains tax is typically calculated as the difference between the sale price and the carrying amount of the property. The carrying amount is the cost of the property, less accumulated depreciation. While depreciation decreases the carrying amount, it increases the capital gains tax base.
Let’s say, for example, you purchased a property for EUR 1 million and sold it for EUR 1.1 million. You owned the property for three years, during which you had a 2% depreciation allowance, amounting to EUR 60,000 over the course of your ownership. Your carrying amount is thus EUR 940,000. Your capital gains tax base will amount to EUR 160,000 — the difference between the sale price and the carrying amount.
In the case of a share deal, the property’s carrying value is of no importance for tax purposes. In this case, profits from the sale of shares are taken into account to calculate asset transfer taxes.
Say, for example, you purchased a company in order to purchase a EUR 1 million property. You then sold the company for EUR 1.1 million. Thus the tax base for asset transfer tax is calculated by deleting the purchase price from the sale price, so in this case your tax base would be EUR 100,000.
In the context of the above examples, it would make more sense financially to purchase the property through a company; doing so would save you EUR 60,000. Investors who already have an exit strategy in mind when purchasing a property — such as those who plan to purchase a property, flip it, and sell it at a profit five years down the road — typically favor this model.
While it’s possible to structure real estate purchases in such a way as to ensure you’ll be exempt from capital gains tax, it’s not easy. Doing so requires extensive research of and familiarity with local legislation in the country that you’re planning to purchase in. It will also likely require corporate ownership and elaborate deal structuring, which is best left to seasoned professionals.
Double taxation laws
Another key issue that can have a considerable impact on capital gains tax is the existence of double taxation laws or relevant treaties between the county where the real estate is located and the country where you registered your company. Double taxation regulations can protect taxpayers from paying the same tax twice.
For some practical examples of this, we spoke to Dmitry Zapol, an international tax advisor at
However, UK law protects taxpayers from double taxation even in the absence of a double tax treaty.
“If foreign rental income suffers withholding tax [in the source country], it is credited towards UK tax liability in order to avoid double taxation. In order to calculate the tax credit, the taxpayer calculates the actual amount of tax paid abroad and sets it off against UK tax liability,” said Mr. Zapol. “In the end, this results either in having to pay the difference between the two amounts (if UK tax is higher) or brings no further tax liability (if UK tax is smaller), although in the latter case the difference will not be refunded. In calculating the tax liability, it is necessary to take into account the difference between UK and foreign tax years, which usually do not run concurrently."
He added: “Normally, the relief is offered under a double taxation agreement concluded by the UK. However, unlike in some countries like Russia, the relief is also available in the absence of the agreement… Normally, the UK resident must submit proof that tax was withheld outside the UK to be able to credit it against his UK tax liability.”
Generally, the ways in which you can benefit from double taxation laws or agreements hinge on whether you purchased the property via a company or as an individual. In order to determine which taxes you’ll be on the hook for in your home country, you will need to familiarize yourself with the ins and outs of the relevant policies.
Mr. Zapol noted that the relevant UK laws are complex. “Broadly, if a UK tax payer buys a foreign company that receives foreign rental income, he must declare its income as if it were his own and pay tax on it or alternatively declare dividends and also suffer tax liability. Interestingly though, if he receives the same company as a true gift from someone else, there is no tax liability until a distribution is made. Also, if the person is domiciled outside the UK, he can claim the remittance basis and stay outside the scope of the transfer of assets abroad rules,” said Mr. Zapol.
Prior to any purchase, I recommend that you consult a tax specialist. Should you have any questions, Tranio will always be happy to help. We can provide you with a comprehensive overview of the tax and legal issues that will apply to your purchase of any overseas property, and help you achieve the optimal transaction structure.
Elena Milishenkova and George Kachmazov, Tranio.com
Originally published on intelligentspeculator.net